Poll Results

Just for fun we'd like to know which of the modern versions of Sherlock Holmes do you prefer and if you like tell us why?

CBS Elementary
17 %17 %17 % 17.92% (148)
BBC Sherlock
82 %82 %82 % 82.08% (678)
Total comments added = 33 Total votes cast = 826
[ Add Comment | Vote Now | Other Polls ]
Displaying 1 to 10 (of 33 comments)  1  2  3  4  [Next >>] 
Comment made by Marie Ann ( ) on 2015-07-11 14:54:33

I like both the TV versions of Sherlock Holmes. They are both unique and fun! Thanks.
Comment made by chuck ( ) on 2015-06-02 03:30:52

Johnny Lee Miller is a great physical actor. The man has perfect body control. I do like the sound of an Englishman in America. His accent and his style is really great. The BBC Sherlock while quite talented is a Englishman speaking generally to other Englishmen which i can stand for only short periods.
Comment made by Jim ( ) on 2015-04-21 11:56:41

Jonny Lee Miller in the TV version is just boring and the show is sometimes also boring. The plots are pretty good but Mr Miller isn't. However, Benedict Cumberbatch seems as though he could be a young version of Sherlock Holmes and manages to carry the role fairly well. Nothing however beats Jim French productions of Sherlock Holmes.
Comment made by Jim Reid ( ) on 2014-12-31 15:06:41

Agreed: neither *is* SH, but neither purports to be. As a re-imagining in time and space, I give the nod to BBC as faithful to the canonical elements throughout. Victorian is not the essence of SH, it is part of the context. The last 11 stories took place as Edward shifted the UK morally and socially. I watch both series, but am tiring of Elementary's merely rhetorical nods to the canon as they pitch an obvious social agenda and present the crime in a contemporarily graphic fashion. Both reflect our obsession with murder. Holmes explained mysteries, solved problems, untied knots; he did not just investigate crimes.
Comment made by David ( ) on 2014-10-12 22:25:05

The question is fundamentally incorrect, and I can't cast a vote for either one. The fact is that neither of these shows is about Sherlock Holmes, who was firmly set in the Victorian and Edwardian periods. Both of these shows are Alternate Universe dreck. BBC's "Sherlock" is about a character who has the same name, and some of Holmes's characteristics, but he is not Holmes. There are a bunch of clever wink-wink moments where the producers and writers try to work in connections to the true Holmes, but that's all that it is. As Shakespeare said in "The Merchant of Venice": "The devil can cite scripture for his own purpose." And "Elementary"? It is an absolute abomination, period. If you have to watch a modern version of Holmes, find a good episode of "House".
Comment made by Larry Coven ( ) on 2014-04-10 18:54:15

After reading the other comments. Jeremy Brett was excellent but not "The only Sherlock Holmes" Rathbone was great--unfortunately Bruce (see him in Hitchcock's "Suspicion", a fine actor actually--was that abysmal incarnation of Watson. Others who have really done excellent Holmes are Christopher Lee, Chritopher Plummer. Nicholas (can't remember his last neme--in 7 per-cent Solution) and even Ronald Howard (not Opie)who did well on a 50's TV series (however another bad Watson), Brett while one of the best, for me lacked Holmes' ironic sense of humor. Holmes had a very dry sense of humor and if you read the stories you will actually see that Watson sometimes objects to his annoying cackling. Now if we get to radio Holmes and Watsons, there are only two really worth mentioning and you are currently on the site of one of them, and the other is BBC's Clive Merrison as Holmes, the late Michael Williams as Watson, who is now being portrayed by Andrew Sachs--who, if you can believe it, played the Spanish incompetent servant on Fawlty Towers. As far as I'm concerned the more who can do them well, while staying true to Doyle's spirit, the better. Oh, to "Old Foggy", it took me a bit, but what a great pun.
Comment made by Larry Coven ( ) on 2014-04-10 18:36:59

Boy, that's a rough choice. They're both contemporary--Elementary isn't even in England. There's a bit more of the original flavor in Sherlock but their recent Scandal In Belgravia was a scandal indeed. Elementary isn't even worth the work it talkes to push the button on my remote. I will say this, there's no problem with the young age of Holmes and Watson on Sherlock as they were young when they met. I do think Watson should be a bit more clearly older than Sherlock, but often folks forget that Holmes was just out of college in A Study in Scarlet.
Comment made by Gunny ( ) on 2014-01-27 23:36:10

I like "Elemental" because of the contemporary treatment of the character Sherlock. I think the relationship between a female Dr. Watson and Holmes is a very believable combination given Holmes inability to fit into "normal" society.
Comment made by Gunny ( ) on 2014-01-27 23:32:15

I watch both of the choices. I like the BBC version because of the "nods" to Doyle s stories. However, "The Sign of Three" aired on PBS on 1.26.14 was an amazing example of writing and acting. The twists and turns during the best mans speach, GRIPPING!!
Comment made by David ( ) on 2013-12-17 21:28:58

You neglected to put a third choice: Neither one - they are NOT about Sherlock Holmes!!
Displaying 1 to 10 (of 33 comments)  1  2  3  4  [Next >>] 
This website and all content contained within is copyright of Jim French Productions - © Jim French Productions 2008. All rights reserved.
Reproduction or redistribution of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited without the expressed written permission of Jim French Productions.
Shirts, Mugs, Apparel and More at CafePress.com